Legislature(2007 - 2008)BELTZ 211
03/25/2008 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
Confirmation Hearing - Alcohol Beverage Control Board and Regulatory Commission of Alaska | |
SB179 | |
SB77 | |
SB179 | |
SJR18 | |
SB179 | |
HB289 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+ | SB 77 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SB 305 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SJR 18 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 289 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 179 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 320 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SJR 18-CHILD PRODUCT SAFETY 2:27:56 PM CHAIR ELLIS announced SJR 18 to be up for its initial consideration. SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI, sponsor of SJR 18, said this measure calls on the United States consumer product safety commission to test the material used in toys and children's products for hazardous products like lead. Over $15 billion worth of toys and children's products were imported into the U.S. from China in 2006 and almost $10 billion in 2007. In 2007 over half the toy and child product recalls by the Child Product Safety Commission (CPSC) were due to chemical poisoning hazards. He explained that the CPSC tests toys for choking, aspiration or ingestion hazards, but relies on toy and child product manufacturers to self-regulate the materials used in making them. He noted that children's bodies and brains are developing and are more susceptible to hazardous impacts to chemicals than those of adults and that limiting their exposure is essential. SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) had testified in support of this resolution and a number of states have already passed legislation limiting lead or cadmium levels. He is not going that route, because he thought it was more appropriate, at this point, for the federal government to do something like this. He related according to lab tests sponsored last fall by more than two dozen consumer groups, about 25 percent of 2,500 randomly selected toys sold in the U.S. contained lead in quantities that would exceed the limit in the Washington State bill that just passed. SENATOR STEVENS remarked that this issue has been in the news a lot lately and asked if the federal government hasn't already been working on it. SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI answered that SR 4040 [he thought] recently passed the U.S. Senate 79-13, but it still needs to get through the House and to be signed by the president. CHAIR ELLIS mentioned that lobbyists have been hired by manufacturers outside of the U.S. to lobby against it; so it's not a done deal. SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said all he is asking is that the toys get tested. Parents have no idea what they're buying in a store for their children and it is fair to ask the federal government to come up with standards and tests for toys. SENATOR BUNDE asked who initiated the recalls if it wasn't the Consumer Protection Agency. KATHERINE PUSTAY, staff to Senator Wielechowski, responded that the recalls are predominantly done by the manufacturers themselves. They include familiar names like Fischer-Price and Mattel. The CPSC doesn't do them. The process has been that watchdog groups test the toys. SENATOR BUNDE asked if, in essence, this measure is asking for a duplication of testing. MS. PUSTAY replied that the American consumer is busy and putting faith in someone that these toys have been tested. They are tested by the Consumer Products Safety Commission for choking and aspiration hazards, but they are not tested to see if the plastic in the pacifier will have adverse affects on a child's health. It's just not in their purview. The watch dog groups are nonprofits and their testing is not comprehensive. 2:35:15 PM SUZANNE ELY, Alaska Conservation Alliance, a consortium of 40 Alaska-based conservation groups, supported SJR 18. She illustrated the need for this measure by noting that just this weekend some Easter eggs were recalled because of high levels of lead paint. She said the federal agency testing these products is not funded enough to include this activity. In fact, it has only one full- time employee testing toys and only 15 inspectors policing all consumer imports that are valued at about $614 billion. They rely on self-reporting and have instances of poisoning before recalling these toys. MS. ELY said while the federal legislation has support, it is not in the bag yet. SJR 18 would increase staffing budget; it would create a public database for complaints about products; it would give power to state prosecutors to act if they think the federal government is not doing enough, which is incredibly important for a state like Alaska, because it could empower Alaskans to do what the federal government wasn't doing. It also increases the possible maximum penalty for violations from $1.25 million to $20 million. 2:37:56 PM COLLEEN KEANE, Alaska Community Action on Toxics, supported SJR 18. She said a lot of the recalls were due to lead and other chemicals that have been found in children's toys and other children's products. These toxins have been found to seriously affect brain development, causing decreased I.Q. scores, shorter attention spans, late learning in children and hypertension and nerve problems in adults. Another group of chemicals commonly found in children's toys is a plasticizer used to made plastics flexible and resilient; they are found in a lot of babies' bibs, teething rings and other soft plastic toys. This group of chemicals has been linked to all sorts of male reproductive development problems in humans. Children are among the most susceptible groups in society for these poisons. MS. KEANE said according to the Environmental Protection Agency, environmental contaminants can affect children quite differently than adults, both because children may be more highly exposed to contaminants and because they may be more vulnerable to their effects as they eat and drink more than adults in proportion to their body weight. 2:41:36 PM CHAIR ELLIS said SJR 18 would be held, but it would be back before the committee in the very near future.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|